Pozvánka na seminář "SELF-RESTRAINT OF THE CEE CONSTITUTIONAL COURTS: DOES IT EXIST AND SHALL IT EXIST?" 27.zaří

9:30-9:40

Opening remarks

9:40-10:00

Jan Malíř (Institute of State and Law, Czech Academy of Sciences, Prague): Judicial self-restraint in comparative perspective: introductory reflections

10:00-10:20

Monika Florczak-Wątor (Jagellonian University Faculty of Law, Cracow): On the necessity of self-restraint of constitutional courts in their law-making activity

10:20-10:40

Harald Eberhard (Vienna University of Economics and Business, Vienna): The Austrian Constitutional Court between judicial activism and judicial self-restraint

10:40-11:25

discussion

11:35-12:00

Fruzsina Gárdos-Orosz (Institute for Legal Studies, Hungarian Academy of Sciences, Budapest), Ágnes Kovács (University of Debrecen, Faculty of Law, Debrecen): Deference in ‘non-core cases’ – the Hungarian example

12:00-12:15

Zoltán Szente (Institute for Legal Studies, Hungarian Academy of Sciences, Budapest): From judicial activism to submission ‒ the long way of the Hungarian constitutional court to political subservience

12:15-12:40

discussion

13:15-13:35

Max Steuer (Comenius University Department of Political Science, Bratislava): The Paradox of Judicial Restraint and Democracy in the Slovak Constitutional Court: Majoritarian Democracy Partnering with Non-Deference

13:35-13:55

Lucia Berdisová (Trnava University Faculty of Law, Trnava), Ján Štiavnický (Constitutional Court of Slovak Republic, Košice): Pressing - political - need

13:55-14:15

Miluše Kindlová (Charles University Faculty of Law, Prague): Judicial activism and judicial self-restraint in citizenship cases

14:15-15:30

discussion & conclusions